NEWS SUMMARY
Date: 24 December 2005
2005年12月23日 是 星期五 星号下的 ♑。 这是一年中的 356 日。 美国总统是 George W. Bush。
如果你出生在这一天,你已经 20 岁了。 您的最后一个生日是 2025年12月23日星期二,180 天前。 2026年12月23日星期三 天后,您的下一个生日是 184。 你已经活了 7,485 天,或者大约 179,663 小时,或者大约 10,779,804 分钟,或者大约 646,788,240 秒。
Date: 24 December 2005
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Michael SCHMIDT
YANKEE CUT NO B
Date: 24 December 2005
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Elisabeth ROSENTHAL
Date: 23 December 2005
By CARL HULSE
Carl HULSE
News analysis says Republicans in Congress have themselves to blame for muddled and haphazard final session; says Republicans broke from White House and party leadership and forced concessions in major legislation or stalled it to bitter end; says upheaval has been instrumental in unraveling unity of legislative leaderships, even as polls show slight uptick in Pres Bush's job approval rating; on face, leaders are expressing satisfaction with accomplishments and White House spokesman Scott McClellan describes year as one of 'solid accomplishment on legislative front'; Democrats are energized by their efforts and believe they have Republicans on offensive (M)
Date: 23 December 2005
By PHILIP SHENON
Philip SHENON
Self-described nonprofit research groups face new scrutiny over their links to special interest groups after disclosure that Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff paid at least two outside writers for opinion articles promoting work of his clients; issue of whether supposedly independent writers and researchers are having their work underwritten--directly or indirectly--by lobbyists and other special interests is not new; but payments by Abramoff and closer review of work of Institute for Policy Innovation, founded by former House Republican leader Dick Armey, are evidence that ties may be much closer than research organizations, conservative and liberal, would prefer to admit; Bush administration has acknowledged that it paid outside writers, including conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, to promote its policies; while major newspapers and magazines usually insist that outside writers disclose conflicts of interest, editors do not routinely conduct background checks (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By JIM YARDLEY
Jim YARDLEY
Date: 24 December 2005
By BILL CARTER
Bill CARTER
Date: 24 December 2005
By C. J. CHIVERS (NYT)
C. CHIVERS
Date: 24 December 2005
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Michael SCHMIDT
YANKEE CUT NO B
Date: 24 December 2005
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Elisabeth ROSENTHAL
Date: 23 December 2005
By CARL HULSE
Carl HULSE
News analysis says Republicans in Congress have themselves to blame for muddled and haphazard final session; says Republicans broke from White House and party leadership and forced concessions in major legislation or stalled it to bitter end; says upheaval has been instrumental in unraveling unity of legislative leaderships, even as polls show slight uptick in Pres Bush's job approval rating; on face, leaders are expressing satisfaction with accomplishments and White House spokesman Scott McClellan describes year as one of 'solid accomplishment on legislative front'; Democrats are energized by their efforts and believe they have Republicans on offensive (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By JIM YARDLEY
Jim YARDLEY
Date: 23 December 2005
By PHILIP SHENON
Philip SHENON
Self-described nonprofit research groups face new scrutiny over their links to special interest groups after disclosure that Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff paid at least two outside writers for opinion articles promoting work of his clients; issue of whether supposedly independent writers and researchers are having their work underwritten--directly or indirectly--by lobbyists and other special interests is not new; but payments by Abramoff and closer review of work of Institute for Policy Innovation, founded by former House Republican leader Dick Armey, are evidence that ties may be much closer than research organizations, conservative and liberal, would prefer to admit; Bush administration has acknowledged that it paid outside writers, including conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, to promote its policies; while major newspapers and magazines usually insist that outside writers disclose conflicts of interest, editors do not routinely conduct background checks (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By BILL CARTER
Bill CARTER
Date: 24 December 2005
By C. J. CHIVERS (NYT)
C. CHIVERS
Date: 24 December 2005
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Elisabeth ROSENTHAL
Date: 24 December 2005
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Michael SCHMIDT
YANKEE CUT NO B
Date: 23 December 2005
By CARL HULSE
Carl HULSE
News analysis says Republicans in Congress have themselves to blame for muddled and haphazard final session; says Republicans broke from White House and party leadership and forced concessions in major legislation or stalled it to bitter end; says upheaval has been instrumental in unraveling unity of legislative leaderships, even as polls show slight uptick in Pres Bush's job approval rating; on face, leaders are expressing satisfaction with accomplishments and White House spokesman Scott McClellan describes year as one of 'solid accomplishment on legislative front'; Democrats are energized by their efforts and believe they have Republicans on offensive (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By JIM YARDLEY
Jim YARDLEY
Date: 23 December 2005
By PHILIP SHENON
Philip SHENON
Self-described nonprofit research groups face new scrutiny over their links to special interest groups after disclosure that Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff paid at least two outside writers for opinion articles promoting work of his clients; issue of whether supposedly independent writers and researchers are having their work underwritten--directly or indirectly--by lobbyists and other special interests is not new; but payments by Abramoff and closer review of work of Institute for Policy Innovation, founded by former House Republican leader Dick Armey, are evidence that ties may be much closer than research organizations, conservative and liberal, would prefer to admit; Bush administration has acknowledged that it paid outside writers, including conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, to promote its policies; while major newspapers and magazines usually insist that outside writers disclose conflicts of interest, editors do not routinely conduct background checks (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By BILL CARTER
Bill CARTER
Date: 24 December 2005
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
Somini SENGUPTA
Date: 24 December 2005
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Michael SCHMIDT
YANKEE CUT NO B
Date: 24 December 2005
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Elisabeth ROSENTHAL
Date: 23 December 2005
By CARL HULSE
Carl HULSE
News analysis says Republicans in Congress have themselves to blame for muddled and haphazard final session; says Republicans broke from White House and party leadership and forced concessions in major legislation or stalled it to bitter end; says upheaval has been instrumental in unraveling unity of legislative leaderships, even as polls show slight uptick in Pres Bush's job approval rating; on face, leaders are expressing satisfaction with accomplishments and White House spokesman Scott McClellan describes year as one of 'solid accomplishment on legislative front'; Democrats are energized by their efforts and believe they have Republicans on offensive (M)
Date: 23 December 2005
By PHILIP SHENON
Philip SHENON
Self-described nonprofit research groups face new scrutiny over their links to special interest groups after disclosure that Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff paid at least two outside writers for opinion articles promoting work of his clients; issue of whether supposedly independent writers and researchers are having their work underwritten--directly or indirectly--by lobbyists and other special interests is not new; but payments by Abramoff and closer review of work of Institute for Policy Innovation, founded by former House Republican leader Dick Armey, are evidence that ties may be much closer than research organizations, conservative and liberal, would prefer to admit; Bush administration has acknowledged that it paid outside writers, including conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, to promote its policies; while major newspapers and magazines usually insist that outside writers disclose conflicts of interest, editors do not routinely conduct background checks (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By JIM YARDLEY
Jim YARDLEY
Date: 24 December 2005
By BILL CARTER
Bill CARTER
Date: 24 December 2005
By C. J. CHIVERS (NYT)
C. CHIVERS
Date: 24 December 2005
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Elisabeth ROSENTHAL
Date: 23 December 2005
By CARL HULSE
Carl HULSE
News analysis says Republicans in Congress have themselves to blame for muddled and haphazard final session; says Republicans broke from White House and party leadership and forced concessions in major legislation or stalled it to bitter end; says upheaval has been instrumental in unraveling unity of legislative leaderships, even as polls show slight uptick in Pres Bush's job approval rating; on face, leaders are expressing satisfaction with accomplishments and White House spokesman Scott McClellan describes year as one of 'solid accomplishment on legislative front'; Democrats are energized by their efforts and believe they have Republicans on offensive (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Michael SCHMIDT
YANKEE CUT NO B
Date: 24 December 2005
By JIM YARDLEY
Jim YARDLEY
Date: 23 December 2005
By PHILIP SHENON
Philip SHENON
Self-described nonprofit research groups face new scrutiny over their links to special interest groups after disclosure that Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff paid at least two outside writers for opinion articles promoting work of his clients; issue of whether supposedly independent writers and researchers are having their work underwritten--directly or indirectly--by lobbyists and other special interests is not new; but payments by Abramoff and closer review of work of Institute for Policy Innovation, founded by former House Republican leader Dick Armey, are evidence that ties may be much closer than research organizations, conservative and liberal, would prefer to admit; Bush administration has acknowledged that it paid outside writers, including conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, to promote its policies; while major newspapers and magazines usually insist that outside writers disclose conflicts of interest, editors do not routinely conduct background checks (M)
Date: 24 December 2005
By BILL CARTER
Bill CARTER
Date: 24 December 2005
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
Somini SENGUPTA