Court Enjoins Post-Dispatch; 2d Article on Study Withheld
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
傑森·科普(Jason Cropper,1971年6月27日出生於美國加州奥克兰)是一位音樂家,同時也是威瑟樂團的創始成員之一。
科普原本是威瑟樂團的成員,並且參與了樂團於1992年2月14日的正式練習。他也在與Geffen唱片公司簽約前,錄製了樂團的前三張正式試聽帶(demo),
然而在1993年,就在錄製他們的第一張專輯《藍色專輯》(Weezer - The Blue Album)時,科普離開了樂團,由目前的吉他手布萊恩·貝爾(Brian Bell)替代了他的位置。科普當時被要求簽下言論禁止令(gag order),因此直到至今他仍然沒有公開談論過與離團有關的事情。之後科普在威瑟樂團的「My Name is Jonas」一曲中被列名為共同作曲者。
在離開威瑟樂團後,科普依然與樂團的其他成員保持好朋友的關係。科普並在2006年參加了主唱瑞弗斯·柯摩的婚禮。
阅读全文...1971年6月27日 是 星期日 星号下的 ♋。 这是一年中的 177 日。 美国总统是 Richard M. Nixon。
如果你出生在这一天,你已经 54 岁了。 您的最后一个生日是 2025年6月27日星期五,360 天前。 2026年6月27日星期六 天后,您的下一个生日是 4。 你已经活了 20,084 天,或者大约 482,018 小时,或者大约 28,921,124 分钟,或者大约 1,735,267,440 秒。
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
Date: 27 June 1971
By FRED P. GRAHAM
Fred GRAHAM
comment on case before US Sup Ct; caricature
Date: 28 June 1971
By JOHN L. HESSSpecial to The New York Times
John HESSSpecial
article on phenomenon of proliferating 'underground press' in W Eur; illus
Date: 27 June 1971
Knight press article repts that study documents show that US mil leaders were putting pressure on Johnson to expand war into Laos, Cambodia and N Vietnam in '66 and '67
Date: 28 June 1971
By ROGER HILSMAN
Roger HILSMAN
R Hilsman lauds Times publication of study documents; says natl security is not endangered; sees bias in study because authors of analyses in study were members of Johnson Adm
Date: 27 June 1971
Special to The New York Times
transcript of oral argument in Times and Washington Post cases before the Sup Ct
Date: 27 June 1971
lrs by G Pressman and others on Pentagon study issue
Date: 27 June 1971
By ROBERT M. SMITHSpecial to The New York Times
Ellsberg lawyers Profs C R Nesson and L B Boudin say Ellsberg will give himself up in Boston to the Fed Govt on the morning of June 28; do not disclose his whereabouts; Boudin gives reasons for Ellsberg not turning himself in during a weekend; says a ruling by Sup Ct favorable to The Times may 'very well dispose of many of the issues presented in our case' since major consideration is whether or not study consists of natl defense documents; lawyers say that even if everything charged against Ellsworth is true, there has been no crime committed
Date: 28 June 1971
By CHRISTOPHER LYDONSpecial to The New York Times
Sup Ct decision awaited; FBI presses its search for Ellsberg; Sen McGovern say study reveals crimes of deception by Govt officials more serious than any violations of security classification involved in its release; Very Rev F B Sayre scores deception and 'abuse of truth' by 'my friends'; Newsweek repts Gallup Poll shows majority of Amer opinion disapproves of Govt effort at suppression; G W Ball says study should be published but cautions against the search for villains or heroes in it, TV int; seems to agree with Ellsberg warning that Nixon Adm now stands at another critical turning point of Vietnam policy; justifies his own pub advocacy of the official view of the war in '66, contrary to his private opposition to expansion of the war he was presenting to Govt's inner councils; says this is 'exactly what any Govt official must necessarily do if there is to be orderly govt'; does not think study presents a security issue; Time magazine repts Rusk warned Pres Kennedy in '61 not to send 8,000 US troops into Vietnam as Taylor was advocating at the time
Date: 27 June 1971
By TOM WICKER
Tom WICKER
T Wicker justifies Times pub of Pentagon documents; says that argument most frequently advanced by those who question Times's decisions to pub documents rests on 2 fallacious assumptions that 'natl interest' and 'natl security' are synonymous and that only most experienced, skilled and informed Govt officials know best; notes that Govt does not necessarily have best information, that it can have preconceived policy convictions despite contrary facts, and that it always has its own pol self-interest to consider